Category Archives: Recreation

Kite Festivals

Posted on by

Festivals and events like these are known throughout the world. It is also known to be family oriented, keeps the family bonded and creates interpersonal relationships. These kinds of events include small local events, traditional festivals that can be traced way back and major international festivals which bring kites and kite fliers from overseas to display their unique art kites and show their cultural designs and demonstrate the latest techniques in flying complex kites today.

In Asian countries, kite flying is a very popular event, especially when the festival houses a kite fight. Kite fighting are flying kites which participants try to snag each others kites and try to cut down each other down. These fighter kites are usually small and flat; they are usually diamond-shaped and are made of paper and bamboo, or any other similar materials that are light and well-built for such kind of game. You might ask, why paper and bamboo? Kites should pretty much be light and since it is played up in the sky, it is always possible for the kite line to be entangled with others kite lines or even in electrical wires. This is why kite fliers use materials that are easy to find and cheaper than silk and fiberglass. Though there are still avid fliers’ that use silk and more expensive kinds of materials, these are played in wide plains and are especially played during festivals and kite events.

In Afghanistan, kite fighting is also known as Gudiparan Bazi. Some kite fighters pass their strings through powders with broken glasses that and crushed into small pieces and glue to ensure that their lines are very abrasive and can severe the opponents strings easier. These abrasive strings are really dangerous and can always injure people as well. This is evident when Taliban rule in Afghanistan kite fliers was banned with other various recreations due to such dangerous acts by some kite fliers that use these tactics to win in kite fighting events.

There are also other stories such as in Vietnam, kites are flown, instead of tails, with small flutes glued and tied allowing the wind to whistle. It creates a musical hum that makes the viewers more in to the game or event. These types are called sound-making kites; others prefer to call them whistling kites. In Bali, they attach large bows to the spars of their kites to create low drum-like sounds. In Malaysia, they make theirs just like the Vietnamese prefer whistles. They use gourds and attached sound-making instruments such as flutes, and even harmonica-like instruments to produce different kinds of whistling sounds.

There are also countries that do not use sounds, but prefer kite fighting. Actually, they place these kite fighting events as their main events and one of which is in India. Just like in India, Pakistan is also one that has embraced these kites as their traditional practice. Flying kites have been a ritual during their spring festivals known as Basant. But again, flying kites were also banned due to, just like what the people of Afghanistan do, the fliers coating their strings with glue and finely crushed glasses. It was banned because of the danger that it cause when the kites flies back down and lands near people. It can endanger lives since kite flying events are popularly known and a lot of locals and even tourists go and watch these events.

Youth Ministry Ideas Recreation In Youth Ministry Things To Consider

Posted on by

In order for recreation to most effectively minister and encourage the highest number of youth it should de-emphasize athletic ability, individual performance, and “winning at all costs”. There are six factors to avoid in planning recreation for youth:

1. Make sure no one is left out;
2. Beware of negative reinforcement;
3. Beware of mismatching youth;
4. Beware of creating psychological stress;
5. Beware of setting youth up for failure; and
6. Beware of over-organization.

In light if these, youth recreation must

1. Emphasize group effort,
2. Encourage total participation,
3. Provide fun for all,
4. Present as many everyone wins situations as possible,
5. Mix planned activities with free time keeps youth from being bored and allows them some freedom to do their own thing.
6. Competition should emphasize the team and not the individual.

Initiative and cooperative games, which emphasize group problem solving make the problem the opponent instead of another person or team. The conquering of these problems as a team effort

1. Builds unity and a sense of group identity,
2. Promotes communication,
3. Encourages cooperation, and
4. Develops trust among team members.

There are several considerations in choosing activity for youth:

1. safety
2. age of the group
3. sex
4. ability of group members
5. size of the group
6. personality of the group
7. the intended purpose of the activity

Edward Hayes (Recreational Activities Youth Education in the Church. Moody Bible Institute, Chicago: 1978. pp 308-323) says youth leaders must account for the basic characteristics of recreation:

1. activity
2. variety of form
3. use of unobligated time
4. voluntary participation
5. flexibility
6. purposeful behavior
7. promotion of socially accepted and thoroughly Christian behavior.

Other considerations:

1. A recreational activity must include as many safety precautions as possible.
2. The age of the group is a factor because different ages of youth will enjoy different games. Also, at younger age groups some youth may lack physical coordination and skill for highly competitive sports.
3. Even though girls can engage in most of the same activities with boys, some activities are best not used with coed groups, especially those that involve highly physical interaction. Also, girls do not necessarily enjoy male dominated sports such as football.
4. The size of the group is important. It is difficult to have a volleyball game with two people. Other games and recreational activities may be inappropriate for large groups.
5. The personality of the group, its likes and dislikes is another important factor. The best game is one that works for your specific group of youth.

Gorakhpur Is Most Beautiful Place For Traveling

Posted on by

Gorakhpur is one of the exclusive cities in India; it is situated near bank of river Rapti in Uttar Pradesh. On tours to Uttar Pradesh (Gorakhpur) you will come across so many beautiful and significant places of tourist interest. Gorakhpur is best place for recreation or traveling.
There is a lot of people come every year to see the Gorakhpur. There are too many temples and some historical building for visiting.
In Gorakhpur there are lot of place for traveling like Gorakhnath Temple, Gita press, Tarkulaha Devi temple and Chauri Chaura.
To see the Gorakhnath temple lot of visitors comes here every year. This temple placed in very large scale. Every here held the fair of Khichdi, at that time many visitors comes here from many villages and cities to Goraknath temple to worship of Lord Shiva and enjoying the fair. It is just 5 Km far from the Gorakhpur railway station.

There is one of the most significant place is Gita Press in Gorakhpur was establishing in the year of 1923 to spread the education about the Gita epic. It is just situated in Urdu Market of Gorakhpur.
The city of Gorakhpur is also a holy place you can also see the big Imambara here. This is constructed by Nawab Asafuddin in near about 1775. It is situated in Maya Bazaar just behind the Kotwali police station.

If you want to visit more other place, you could be going Tarkulaha Devi Temple is most exclusive attraction near Gorakhpur. This holy temple is just located near around 4 to 5 kilometers from Chauri Cahura. This temple has been founded by Deeb Bandhu Singh was the great freedom fighter.

Everyday many Buddhist Pilgrims visitors also come in Gorakhpur for visiting the Kushinagar. This is that place where Lord Buddha preached his last sermon. On every year on Buddha Purnima the lots of people in Kushi nagar celebrate the birthday of Lord Buddha. It just far 55 to 60 kilometers from Gorakhpu Railway stations. They just hire the bus or jeep for going Kushinagar; its just near the Deoria.

After visiting the, you can also see the gorakhpur city like Urdu Bazaar, Golghar Market, Rapti Nagar, Tara Mandal and Geta Vatika garden. The main market for shopping purpose, Golghar market is famous, you can purchase here everything which is you needed.

So if you are interested in traveling, to must be come one time in gorakhpur for traveling and see many beautiful and some historical places here. There are many travel agency and travel agent who are guiding you for traveling in city tour and tell them much other knowledge about India tour and city tour. You can also enjoy here your cheap vacation and cheap family holidays here; you just book your tickets online for recreation and enjoying you holidays.

Rv Covers Protect Your Recreational Vehicle For 339 Days Each Year

Posted on by

Vacations in a recreational vehicle (RV) have several advantages over other kinds of vacations. RV vacations are flexible and convenient; you are at liberty to travel anywhere you wish at any time that suits you. On an RV vacation, you can enjoy the comforts of home as you travel to new places, and you can enjoy more quality time with family, including the pets. RVs are also a more affordable way to vacation, according to studies comparing vacation costs. The results of this increased recognition of the advantages of RV vacations can be seen in the rise of RV sales, and sales are projected to continue rising over the next year or more, according to the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA).

One may wonder, though, what happens to RVs when they are not out on the road. A 2005 University of Michigan study authorized by the RVIA discovered that RV owners are on the road 26 days each year, on average. This leaves approximately 339 days when the RV is not in use. Where does the RV “live” when its owners are not taking a vacation? While an enclosed garage or storage area is the ideal location to store an RV for any length of time, most owners don’t have facilities like these at hand. More often than not, an RV sits on a homeowner’s property or at an outdoor RV storage facility. Harsh weather, moisture, sun, insects, birds, dirt, and other debris can take a heavy and expensive toll on an RV, so the best way to protect an RV is with RV covers. RV covers are a necessary accessory for ensuring that your mobile vacation home stays in top shape until the next time you want to take it on the road.

There’s a proper RV cover to fit just about every kind of RV, from Class A and Class C to travel trailers, folding campers, truck campers, and 5th wheel RVs. Be sure to select the appropriate cover for your particular RV so that you know it will fit properly. RV covers can be custom made, too, for those who want an even better fit or special features. Just any kind of RV covers won’t do, though. RV covers should be made from a robust, but breathable material. You’ll want a material that can resist harsh weather conditions, but also prevent moisture from becoming trapped and developing into mold and mildew. Some RV covers come equipped with access panels, making it easier to reach different parts of your RV without having to remove the entire cover to do so.

Covering other exposed parts of your RV is vital, too, especially when storing the vehicle for an extended period of time. RV wheel covers are an easy way to protect your tires from weather damage, and from damage that the sun’s UV rays can produce. In addition, there are RV covers to protect propane and LP gas tanks from sun and weather exposure, and RV covers for air conditioners which protect the units not only from sun and weather, but from insects who may like to nest inside.

When you’re ready to hit the road on your next RV vacation, you can easily remove and store your RV covers until you need them again. If you leave your vehicle in good condition before covering it, you’ll find it in the same good shape when the covers are off. This means that you can spend less time preparing your RV for departure and more time enjoying the scenery. Overall, if you are amid the many millions of people across the country who are joining the ranks of proud and satisfied RV owners, then taking proper care of your recreational vehicle when it’s not in use will ensure that it continues to take you comfortably and safely on travel adventures for many years to come.

Private Property Vs. Public Trust

Posted on by

There are two types of property ownership recognized by law, jus privatum and jus publicum. Everybody’s familiar with jus privatum, also known as fee simple ownership. It means that you have title to a parcel of property, which confers upon you certain rights with respect to that property. Historically, private property rights have been defined as:
The right to control the use of your property.
The right to the benefits that accrue from your property.
The right to sell or transfer your property.
The right to exclude others from access to your property.
On the other hand, few people are familiar with jus publicum, also known as the public trust. Jus publicum ownership is always vested in the state, never in a private party. Unlike jus privatum, jus publicum is not transferrable. Furthermore, in any case where jus publicum can be established, it overrides jus privatum. Therein lies the rub. That enables the state to use jus publicum to abrogate your private property rights, without your consent and without compensation, in any situation where jus publicum can be established.

The idea of public trust goes back to English Common Law.

“Both the title and the dominion of the sea, and of rivers and arms of the sea, where the tide ebbs and flows, and of all the lands below high water mark, within the jurisdiction of the crown of England, are in the King. Such waters and the lands which they cover either at all times or at least when the tide is in, are incapable of ordinary and private occupation, cultivation, and improvement and their natural and primary uses are public in their nature, for highways of navigation and commerce, domestic and foreign, and for the purpose of fishing by all the King’s subjects. Therefore the title, jus privatum, in such lands, as of waste and unoccupied lands, belongs to the king, as the sovereign; and the dominion thereof, jus publicum, is vested in him, as the representative of the nation and for the public benefit.”
— U.S. Supreme Court, Shively v. Bowlby (1894)After the American Revolution, the thirteen former colonies that made up the newly formed Union assumed the title and rights of the King to all navigable rivers within their respective territories. The jus publicum was held to be non-transferrable, acting as a permanent public easement on the jus privatum title for purposes of navigation, commerce, and fishing, as originally designated under English Common Law. At a time when rivers were the most practical means of transporting people and goods over long distances, the free use of navigable waterways was considered essential for the development of local and interstate economies.

As other states were admitted to the Union, they were guaranteed equal footing with the original thirteen, and so acquired the same title and rights to the navigable rivers within their jurisdiction.

Said rivers and waterways and all navigable waters of the said state shall be common highways and forever free as well to the inhabitants of said state as to all citizens of the United States without tax, duty, import or toll thereafter.
— Act for Admission of Oregon into the United States (1859)In accordance with the original intent of the law, jus publicum was traditionally defined as the specific public rights associated with using rivers as “highways of navigation and commerce” and for purposes of fishing. While a highway is dedicated to public use, no sane person would claim the right to sit down in the middle of a highway and have a picnic. That is not one of the designated purposes of a highway. Likewise, it never occurred to anyone to claim that recreation would be an applicable purpose for which to invoke jus publicum. — Up until 25 years ago, that is, at which time the state of California came up with the notion that the definition of jus publicum could be extended to include whatever purposes the state might find convenient.

The objective of the public trust has evolved in tandem with the changing public perception of the values and uses of waterways. … [T]he traditional triad of uses – navigation, commerce and fishing – did not limit the public interest in the trust res. … “In administering the trust the state is not burdened with an outmoded classification favoring one mode of utilization over another.”
— California Supreme Court, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court of Alpine County (1983)In that case, the California Supreme Court extended jus publicum to include non-navigable tributaries of Mono Lake. The court ruled that the state could prevent the Department of Water and Power for the City of Los Angeles from using its legally owned water rights because the usage interfered with the supply of water to Mono Lake. The water rights were deemed to be a public trust for “environmental and human considerations” having nothing to do with the traditional jus publicum rights relating to navigation, commerce, or fishing. The court rejected a regulatory takings claim because the land was held to be exempt from fee simple title on the grounds that it was a public trust and, therefore, no compensation was due to the plaintiff for the loss of their water rights.

That ruling opened the door for other states to expand the scope of jus publicum beyond its original intent, in whatever ways captured their imagination.

The nature of the ownership includes two components: fee simple title (the jus privatum) and dominion as the publics trustee over the natural resource for public trust uses such as navigation, commerce, fisheries and recreation (the jus publicum).
— Oregon Department of State Lands, Rogue River Navigability Report (2008 ) Oregon, quietly and without fanfare, slipped “and recreation” into the list of rights held in trust for the public under jus publicum. Nobody blinked so, by precedent, the “right” to recreation is now part of the legal definition of the public trust in the state of Oregon. What difference does that make? If you own riverfront property, the traditional definition of jus publicum guaranteed passage for boats on the river without your explicit consent. The new and improved definition declares that anybody who wants to may have picnics and parties in your backyard (at least the part of it that extends below the high water mark). In the course of carefree recreation, people often make noise, leave litter, and sometimes do damage to property. But there’s nothing you can do about that, because the state of Oregon declared they have as much right to use your property for recreation as you do. You can ask them to pick up their litter, but you can’t enforce it. And, if they damage your property, you can try to sue them, if you can find out who they are… But you have no legal right to keep them out, or to restrict what they may do while they’re enjoying your property.

Oregon was not the first state to include recreation in the definition of jus publicum. In 1999 (National Association of Home Builders v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection), riverfront property owners were compelled to allow a public pathway along the river, through their property, with no compensation for takings, because the right to access the river for recreational purposes was ruled a public trust. Because the path is on their property, the “owners” have the responsibility of maintaining it (just like a public sidewalk) and, presumably, they also carry the liability if anyone should get hurt while traversing it.

In 2002 (Esplanade Properties, LLC v. City of Seattle), the Ninth Circuit Court used the state of Washington’s expanded definition of jus publicum to prohibit residential development of privately owned shoreline properties. Because the recreational use of the shoreline is considered a public trust, no compensation was awarded to the fee simple “owners” of the property.

According to The Idea of Property: Custom and Public Trust, in 2001 (R. W. Docks & Slips v. Wisconsin), the Wisconsin Supreme Court “expanded the public trust doctrine to include recreation and preservation of scenic beauty.” Subsequently, Florida and other states “expansively interpreted” the public trust doctrine to include both recreation and scenic beauty, as well. When the state can rule that the public’s “right” to scenic beauty supercedes the private property rights of individuals, one has to wonder if there are any limits to the ever-expanding powers of state government to abrogate our property rights for whatever arbitrary purpose they may declare.

When the state declares your property, or some part of your property, to be a public trust, it can legally deprive you of the traditional rights associated with private property ownership. In the cases cited above, property owners were deprived of the right to control the use of their property, the right to economic benefits accruing from their property, and the right to exclude others from access to their property. Yet, as long as the justification is based on jus publicum (or expanded definitions thereof), the state is not required to pay any compensation for takings under the laws of eminent domain. Because jus publicum is non-transferrable, the state will claim the property rights in question never did actually belong to you (though you will continue to owe property taxes on the property).